malecare®  Men fighting cancer together.  

Prostate Cancer, Support Groups  and Prostate Cancer Treatment

Home | Up | 攝護腺癌 | Espanol | Francais | עברית | Italiano | Portugues | Russian | Site Map | Donate to Malecare   

Back to list of Articles

 Health & Social Work / Volume 28, Number 4 / November 2003

P r o s t a t e  C a n c e r  a n d

Psychosocial  C o n c e r n s  in

African American  M e n :

Literature  Synthesis and  Recommendations

Robert Pierce, Letha A. Chadiha, Amy Vargas, and Muriel Mosley

African American men have the

highest prostate cancer rates in the

world, and more die from the disease

than men from other racial or ethnic

groups. Because the social work

literature has little information on

prostate cancer in African American

men, the authors have synthesized the

literature on prostate cancer and

psychosocial concerns in African

American men. They used the Health

Belief Model as a framework to help

explain, understand, and predict

African American men’s preventive

health-related behaviors. The authors

make recommendations for social work

practice and research.

Key words

African American men

Health Belief Model

prostate cancer

A frican American men have the highest prostate cancer

rates in the world, and more die from the disease

than men from other racial or ethnic groups (Parker,

Johnston Davis, Wingo, Ries, & Heath, 1998). Data

from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance,

Epidemiology and End Results Project show that African

American prostate cancer patients have higher age-adjusted

incidence and mortality rates than white, Hispanic, and Asian

and Pacific Islander patients with the disease (Wingo, Ries,

Rosenberg, Miller, & Edwards, 1998). Moreover, between 1990

and 1995 the age-adjusted (to the 1970 U.S. standard 100,000

population) incidence of prostate cancer among these groups

was 220.3 for African Americans 153.5 for white men, 106.7

for Hispanics, and 91.3 for Asian and Pacific Islanders. Mortality

rates from prostate cancer for the same five-year period

per 100,000 population were 66.0 for African Americans, 24.1

for white men, 16.6 for Hispanics, and 11.1 for Asian and Pacific

Islanders (Wingo et al., 1998). Despite improvements in

diagnosis and treatment, these data indicate that African

Americans have yet to realize noticeable gains in prostate cancer

survival (Clayton & Byrd, 1993).

The observed racial disparity and the psychosocial concerns

of African American prostate cancer patients are addressed in

literature on cancer screening, prevention, risk factors, knowledge,

beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to cancer screening

(Abbott, Taylor, & Barber, 1998; Chodak, 1996; Demark-

Wahnefried et al., 1995; Myers, Wolf, Balshem, Ross, & Chodak,

1994; Myers et al., 1996; Ndubuisi, Kofie, Andoh, & Schwartz,

1995; Weinrich, 1998). Given their greater susceptibility and

the disproportionate burden that prostate cancer places on

African American men and their families, why is so little heard

from social workers about the psychosocial concerns of these

men and their families? Like all men with prostate cancer, African

Americans also agonize over the physical and emotional

effects of the disease. Other psychosocial concerns African

303 Prostate Cancer and Psychosocial Concerns in African American Men

Americans must contend with include background

characteristics (for example, race, location, socioeconomic

status, family history, and medical history),

attitudes and beliefs about cancer (for example,

risk, severity, screening and testing, and

treatment), social support from family and church,

family caregiving issues, religious coping, motivations

for engaging in preventive health behavior,

acquisition of and exposure to educational and informational

programs, and help-seeking behaviors

(Myers, 1999; Myers et al., 1994, 1996; Plowden,

1999; Sharp, 1993).

Although prostate cancer is a serious threat to

them, African American men are highly underrepresented

in clinical trials. Robinson, Ashley, and

Haynes (1996), in a focus group study of African

American men, found them less willing to participate

in clinical trials when they were of lower socioeconomic

background and distrusted the medical

establishment. On the other hand, if they knew

a professional, such as a doctor or researcher, who

was deemed competent and compassionate and referred

men to participate, then the men were more

willing to participate in clinical trials. Social workers

in health care settings are in an ideal position

to communicate the facts about prostate cancer

and psychosocial concerns and pursue a more active

role in designing and implementing effective

interventions for African American men.

The purpose of this article is to increase understanding

of prostate cancer and the accompanying

psychosocial concerns of African American

men. We reviewed and synthesized literature on

prostate cancer and psychosocial concerns in African

American men. We present an overview of

the Health Belief Model and prostate cancer literature

supporting the model.

Health Belief Model

The Health Belief Model (HBM; Rosenstock, 1960)

provides a useful theoretical framework for understanding

and predicting the health-related

behaviors of African Americans with prostate cancer

(Myers, 1999; Plowden, 1999). An underlying

assumption of the HBM is that understanding an

individual’s motivation to engage or not engage

in certain health-related behaviors will help determine

the individual’s pattern of preventive

health practices (Rosenstock; Strecher &

Rosenstock, 1997). Five dimensions of the HBM

can help explain what motivates African Americans

with prostate cancer to engage or not engage

in health-related behaviors (Plowden): (1) perceived

susceptibility (that is, the person’s beliefs

and attitudes about contracting the illness); (2)

perceived severity (that is, the person’s assessment

of the seriousness of having the illness or not having

treatment for the illness); (3) perceived benefits

(that is, the person’s assessment of the positive

outcomes of seeking treatment for the illness);

(4) perceived barriers (that is, factors that impede

a person’s motivation to engage in health-related

practices); and (5) prompts to take action (that is,

internal and external triggers that stimulate an individual

to change his or her behavior for more

positive outcomes.

A number of researchers consider the HBM the

most influential and empirically based theory of

motivation for understanding health-related behaviors

(Damrosch, 1991; Myers, 1999; Plowden,

1999). However, some claim the original model is

limited for addressing such psychosocial concerns

as attitudes and beliefs about illness, economic and

cultural factors, and the role of the social network

of family and peers in illness or disease

(Damrosch). Addressing these issues is important

in achieving a fuller understanding of African

American men’s health-related behaviors. Even

with limitations the HBM is a useful framework

for understanding motivations, global attitudes,

and beliefs underlying a person’s health-related

behaviors. Studies that address psychosocial concerns,

such as the attitudes, beliefs, social support,

coping, and psychological distress for African

American prostate cancer patients, help to overcome

the weakness of the original HBM (Germino

et al., 1998; Myers et al., 1994, 1996; Tingen,

Weinrich, Heydt, Boyd, & Weinrich, 1998;

Underwood, 1991).

Literature Relating To

HBM Model

The discussion in this article builds and expands

on work by Plowden (1999) on the HBM, integrating

psychosocial literature on African American

prostate cancer patients with theoretical and

empirical literature on the HBM. This integration

of literature can yield greater insights into prostate

cancer and accompanying psychosocial concerns

in African American men.

Perceived Susceptibility

Perceived susceptibility is the individual’s attitudes

and beliefs about the risk of acquiring an illness

or disease (Rosenstock, 1960). With regard to psychosocial

concerns in African American prostate

304 Health & Social Work / Volume 28, Number 4 / November 2003

cancer patients, background and lifestyle factors

such as age, race and ethnicity, family history, and

diet are known risk factors (Plowden, 1999). Being

an African American man below 50 with a family

history of prostate cancer and eating food high

in fat content are other risk factors for prostate

cancer (American Cancer Society, 1998; Demark-

Wahnefried et al., 1995; Powell, Gelfand,

Parzuchowski, Heilbrun, & Franklin, 1995). Although

men over age 60 are more likely to be diagnosed

with prostate cancer than men under age

60, African Americans are more likely to be diagnosed

at a much younger age than men from other

racial and ethnic groups (Wingo et al., 1998). Even

controlling for socioeconomic status, African

American men are at greater risk of being diagnosed

at a much earlier age and with late or more

advanced stages of prostate cancer than non–African

American men (Parker et al., 1998). Abrams

and colleagues (1990) suggested that the age or developmental

stage of the person at diagnosis may

be the single most important psychosocial determinant

in how a person reacts to cancer. For example,

the emotional responses of a younger man

with a family and young children to prostate cancer

may be quite different from those of an elderly

man with a family and adult children.

Being an African American man

below 50 with a family history

of prostate cancer and eating

food high in fat content are other

risk factors for prostate cancer.

Early detection and prompt treatment are essential

to controlling prostate cancer (Robinson et

al., 1996). Literature on early cancer detection and

risk reduction suggests that increasing knowledge

and awareness about prostate cancer is essential to

reducing cancer risk in African American men

(Smith, DeHaven, Grundig, & Wilson, 1997). Smith

and colleagues studied 556 African American men

over age 40 and found that they had limited knowledge

about risk factors for prostate cancer. Only

42.2 percent knew that family history was a cancer

risk factor; only 30 percent knew that race was a

risk factor. If a family member had cancer and men

had a regular doctor, they were more knowledgeable

about prostate cancer risks. If men reported

low education and low incomes, they were less

knowledgeable about prostate cancer risks. Other

studies support findings about risk factors and

knowledge among African American men with

prostate cancer (Myers et al., 1996; Smith et al.,

1997). For example, even though African American

men perceived the risk of prostate cancer as

being high for other same-race men, they tended

to rate their personal risk as lower (Myers et al.,

1996).

Perceived Severity

Actions that an individual takes to engage in healthrelated

behaviors is influenced by the individual’s

perceived seriousness of acquiring an illness or

leaving it untreated (Damrosch, 1991; Plowden,

1999; Strecher & Rosenstock, 1997). More specifically,

perceived severity is the extent to which an

individual evaluates the consequences of having

an illness—such as dying or losing his or her ability

to function (Strecher & Rosenstock). Perceptions

about cancer severity in African American

men are found in early detection literature. In a

study of African American (n = 286) and white (n

= 1,218) men, Demark-Wahnefried and colleagues

(1995) found that African American men were significantly

less likely to have had a digital rectal examination

or a prostate-specific antigen test. In a

study by Smith and colleagues (1997), 58 percent

of African American men reported that they felt

no need to have a digital rectal examination unless

they experienced pain while urinating. Yet, approximately

75 percent of men reported it was important

for a man age 40 or older to have a digital

rectal examination to identify prostate cancer problems.

These findings suggest that African American

men may know the risk of prostate cancer for

younger men. However, they may not perceive a

personal threat of acquiring prostate cancer because

of a misunderstanding of its symptomology.

Although a large screening study found no significant

racial difference between African American

and white men in advanced prostate cancer at diagnosis

(Smith, Bullock, Catalona, & Herschman,

1996), other studies have shown that African

Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with

and treated for more advanced prostate cancer than

white men (Mebane, Gibbs, & Horm, 1990;

Optenberg et al., 1995; Powell, Schwartz, & Hussain,

1995; Targonski, Guinan, & Phillips, 1991). Moreover,

the disparity in presentation with advanced

prostate cancer exists for African Americans even

when socioeconomic status is controlled (Ndubuisi

305 Prostate Cancer and Psychosocial Concerns in African American Men

et al., 1995), and African American men are believed

to have equal access to veteran’s health services

(Optenberg et al., 1995).

The perceived threat of an illness, especially

accompanying fears of illness outcome, may spur

an individual to seek treatment. However, if a person

is not threatened by an illness, then the person

is unlikely to be motivated to seek and accept

treatment (Damrosch, 1991). African Americans

reported more fear of cancer than members of the

general population; they may acknowledge the severity

of cancer yet be pessimistic about its cure

(American Cancer Society, 1998). Literature regarding

African American men’s perception about

cancer cure conflicts with this more fatalistic perception.

For instance, studies with relatively large

samples reported that a preponderance of African

American men believed that prostate cancer could

be cured (Myers, 1999; Smith et al., 1997). Still,

the perceived uncontrollability of cancer is often

at the root of pessimism and fatalism for some

individuals with cancer and this, in turn, may affect

individuals’ psychosocial functioning in an

unfavorable way (Christ, 1989).

Perceived Benefits

Whether an individual is motivated to engage in

health-related actions is determined by an

individual’s perceptions of outcomes (Rosenstock,

1960). An African American man’s perceptions

about the saliency and efficacy of an early detection

examination help inform his perceptions

about benefits. Among 218 African American men

in a study by Myers and colleagues (1996), more

than one-half (59 percent) perceived an early detection

examination to be an effective health behavior

for preventing cancer. In this same study,

results of multivariate analyses indicated that perceived

efficacy of an early detection examination

and support from a physician significantly predicted

an African American man’s intention to

undergo early detection examination. Tingen and

colleagues (1998) found that a measure of perceived

benefits (that is, the personal beliefs about

the usefulness of prostate cancer screening and

early detection) was a significant predictor of a

man’s participation in prostate cancer screening

when controlling for race, education, marital status,

and receiving an educational intervention.

Although African American and white men reported

similarly on the perceived benefits measure,

African American men were significantly less likely

to participate in screening. These findings are instructive

in considering ways to increase African

American men’s participation in early detection

examination. Plowden (1999) noted that if a person

perceived no benefit from cancer screening or

treatment, then he was unlikely to participate in

such health-related behaviors. Damrosch (1991)

stated that it is essential for the person seeking care

to know that perceived positive outcomes are

“both feasible and efficacious” (p. 834). To the extent

that African American men perceive an early

detection examination and cancer treatment as

feasible and efficacious, these men may lower their

risk of presenting with a more advanced stage of

cancer. They are also likely to reduce their risk of

dying from cancer. Findings in a study by Tingen

and colleagues suggest a warning about perceived

benefits and participation in screening for African

American men: Men may perceive both benefits

and barriers to screening. These researchers

suggested that an examination of perceived benefits

and barriers in future studies involving African

American men could help clarify their perceptions

of benefits.

Perceived Barriers

According to the HBM, perceived barriers to seeking

care are factors that hinder a person from engaging

in health-seeking behaviors (Rosenstock,

1960). Barriers may operate from within or outside

the individuals (Plowden, 1999). One way in

which a barrier operates from within individuals

can be seen through the perceptions they hold

about illness and disease.

With regard to African American men and prostate

cancer, findings in a national cancer study of

U.S. men illuminate how their own perceptions

may be a barrier to early prostate cancer detection

(Gallup Organization Healthcare Group, 1995).

African American men were 8 percent (n = 95) of

1,193 men ranging in age from 45 to 75 years in this

national study. Fifty percent of all African American

men in this national study were least likely to

feel men should have annual rectal exams to determine

the prostate size; a corresponding percentage

of African American men viewed the cancer test as

embarrassing and painful. All men in the study

responded that the possibility of wearing diapers

and becoming impotent would affect their decision

to seek an early diagnosis of cancer, but these

issues were of greater concern to African American

and Hispanic men than to white men.

Other studies document similar concerns about

incontinence and impotence among African

306 Health & Social Work / Volume 28, Number 4 / November 2003

American men (Coley, Barry, & Mulley, 1997;

Myers et al., 1996). Cultural values may help explain

these concerns. Plowden (1999) asserted that

many men value their sexuality and independence

and that, for a large proportion, their masculinity

and sexuality are closely linked. Franklin (1992)

noted that being in control of a situation is a key

symbol of manliness in African American male

culture. An African American man’s more negative

perceptions about pain and embarrassment,

as well as possible incontinence and impotence in

prostate cancer treatment, may have been shaped

largely through the culture of masculinity and

oppression in U.S. society. These men may bear

witness indirectly and directly to the history of

oppression in U.S. society in which African American

men have been violated in terms of their sexual

organs. Regardless of the origins of these men’s

perceptions, their negative perceptions about an

annual rectal exam, pain and embarrassment associated

with the exam, wearing diapers, and impotence

may hinder their participation in cancer

screening. Lacking cancer screening, African

American men may be less likely to have their cancer

detected early and likely to increase their risk

of dying from cancer.

Religion may serve as both a barrier and a coping

resource in African Americans with prostate

cancer. Geertz (1973) defined religion as “a system

of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive,

and long-lasting moods and motivations in

men [sic] by formulating conceptions of a general

order of existence and clothing these conceptions

with such an aura of factuality that the moods and

motivations seem uniquely realistic” (p. 90).

Underwood (1991) found that African American

men perceived their cancer as the will of God. Potts

(1996) found that African American cancer patients

often looked to “God as the source of healing and

recovery from cancer” (p. 9). Moreover, cancer

patients used prayer to cope with cancer (Potts).

Pierce (1999), in a case study of a man with prostate

cancer, learned that the man found strength to

cope with his cancer through support from family—

his mother “prayed on it” and reminded him

that God would see him through the illness.

Plowden (1999) and others (Strawbridge, Cohen,

Shema, & Kaplan, 1997) highlighted the salutary

effect of religion on health behavior in African

Americans. For example, a study found that frequent

church attendees had lower mortality rates

than infrequent church attendees (Strawbridge et

al.). African Americans were more likely than non–

African Americans to attend church frequently. A

sparse literature exists on religion and prostate

cancer, thus making it difficult to reach firm conclusion

about this topic for African American men.

Nonetheless, this literature stresses the importance

of religion in helping these men make sense of their

illness.

Research suggests that men’s socioeconomic

status may serve as a barrier to seeking care. African

American men with less than a high school

education ranked highest among men most likely

to postpone or avoid testing and screening because

of lack of insurance or health care plans (Gallup

Organization Healthcare Group, 1995). Early cancer

detection and intervention with these men to

deal with their cancer are hampered when they lack

access to medical care (Plowden, 1999).

Although studies are fairly consistent in reporting

a higher incidence and mortality rate resulting

from prostate cancer in African Americans,

studies are mixed about the role of socioeconomic

status in their survival (Optenberg et al.,

1995; Powell, Schwartz, et al., 1995; Robbins,

Whittemore, & Thom, 2000). Robbins and colleagues

noted that a lower survival rate in relatively

younger African American men (those under age

65) diagnosed with prostate cancer may have multiple

reasons, including detection of a more virulent

prostate tumor, an inaccurate measure of socioeconomic

status, unmeasured factors such as

social support, and residual confounding of socioeconomic

status and treatment. Noneconomic

barriers such as race and location may explain the

poorer survival of African Americans with prostate

cancer. According to Friedman (1994), African

Americans experience racial discrimination in

obtaining health care because of skin color. They

also reside in low-income urban areas that lack

adequate health care services.

Prompts to Action

Plowden (1999) noted that having a perceived susceptibility

to prostate cancer, knowing the severity

associated with it, and knowing the benefits of

early treatment are necessary, but not sufficient,

motivators for an individual to engage in preventive

health behavior. Equally important, “an individual

has to have the perceived ability to seek care”

(Plowden, p. 5). An underlying assumption of the

HBM in emphasizing readiness to take action is

that a person must be prompted to act. Both internal

prompts (for example, symptoms) and external

prompts (for example, knowledge and

307 Prostate Cancer and Psychosocial Concerns in African American Men

information about illness and disease) may motivate

a person to seek care (Plowden).

There is compelling evidence that significant

others, such as peers and professionals, can be effective

prompts to action for an African American

man’s participation in cancer screening. A study

by Tingen and colleagues (1998) showed that an

educational intervention including a peer educator

and social worker to help men navigate the

health system was a more effective motivator for

their screening participation than either educational

information or a peer educator’s personal

testimony.

Institutions such as churches,

barbershops, taverns, and fraternal

organizations may also

serve as a source of help to African

Americans with prostate

cancer.

Help seeking is a key variable in cancer management

and rehabilitation. All human societies

practice some form of help seeking and health

maintenance that govern decisions about illness

identification, treatment, and management

(Landrine & Klonoff, 1992; Sussman, 1996). Individuals

learn practices of help seeking and illness

management through their family, culture, and

society.

The literature has long emphasized the role of

the informal help system in cancer patients’ psychosocial

functioning. Wortman and Dunkel-

Schetter (1979) asserted that an informal support

system—the social network of family, friends, and

even other cancer patients—is essential to the cancer

patient’s illness management and rehabilitation.

Sussman (1996) noted that an illness may lead

not only to a medical crisis but also to a social and

psychological crisis among a network of people—

patient, family, friends, and community. Members

of the cancer patient’s informal network play a

critical role in helping the person clarify and manage

an illness through the use of existing cultural

beliefs, norms, and values.

Literature documents African Americans’ heavy

reliance on the informal network of family, friends,

and neighbors. Such a support system provides

African Americans who are experiencing crisis with

tangible and intangible sources of help (Neighbors,

1985; Neighbors & Taylor, 1985). Regarding African

American prostate cancer patients, Myers et

al. (1996) found that support received from family

was significantly associated with a man’s intention

to seek cancer screening and health advice from

professionals. Although we found no literature on

the social support that African Americans with

prostate cancer receive from friends, a work by

Franklin (1999) illuminates the structuring of

friendship relationships in African American men.

According to Franklin, friendship structures

among African American men may vary within

race and across class. For example, same-sex friendships

among working-class African American men

tend to be warm and intimate. The converse would

be true for same-sex friendships among upwardly

mobile African American men.

Institutions such as churches, barbershops, taverns,

and fraternal organizations may also serve as

a source of help to African Americans with prostate

cancer (Lee, 1999). Powell, Gelfand, and colleagues

(1995) found the church and ministers to

be a motivating factor in the recruitment and participation

of African American men in an early

detection prostate cancer educational program. For

instance, ministers of local churches played a critical

role in gaining the trust and participation of

men in a cancer educational program. Churches

may also function as a quasi-family to African

Americans with prostate cancer (Pierce, 1999). According

to Lum (2000), “for African Americans,

the church is intricately involved in personal, family,

and social needs” of community residents (p.

301).

The help a cancer patient receives from an informal

support system may facilitate illness clarification,

validation, and management (Goldberg

& Cullen, 1985; Wortman & Dunkel-Schetter,

1979), but seeking help from others during the illness

has costs as well as benefits. Neighbors (1997),

in a national study of African Americans, documented

that spouses, kin, and friends were a source

of stress and a source of support. Also, African

American prostate cancer patients may receive severe

criticism from a loved one or friend about

hesitating to comply with a recommended medical

intervention or course of therapy (for example,

chemotherapy). However, the benefits of seeking

help from others may outweigh the costs. Literature

indicates that African Americans with prostate

cancer value the support of family and professionals

in seeking early detection examination or

308 Health & Social Work / Volume 28, Number 4 / November 2003

participating in clinical trials (Myers et al., 1996;

Robinson et al., 1996).

Recommendations

Practice

An underlying assumption of the HBM is that

understanding an individual’s motivation to engage

or not engage in certain health-related behaviors

helps determine that individual’s pattern

of preventive health practices. Social workers can

help motivate African American men with prostate

cancer to engage in positive health-related

behaviors by understanding and appreciating the

factors that hinder or promote such behaviors

(Sharp, 1993). Social workers can motivate African

American men to participate in prostate cancer

screening by providing educational information

and making timely personal follow-up

telephone calls (Tingen et al., 1998).

From a social work perspective, maximizing

health care services to African American prostate

cancer patients requires that social workers acknowledge

the vital roles they play (for example,

teacher, enabler, mediator, broker, planner, and

advocate) in the lives of these men and their families.

Regardless of social workers’ roles, they should

consider the facts about African American prostate

cancer patients when “judging and deciding

what is good and what is bad” about their health

beliefs and behaviors (Julia, 1996, p. 4).

Perhaps the most important roles for social

workers are those of educator and active listener.

As active listeners, social workers suspend personal

views about how people should believe and behave

when ill. Rather, social workers become

enablers and encourage people to talk about their

health beliefs and behaviors—a process that benefits

both client and social worker. For many African

American men, their encounter with the social

worker may be the first opportunity to share

fears and concerns about prostate cancer. For social

workers, this sharing process becomes an opportunity

to understand an African American

man’s distrust and fear of medical systems, their

lack of knowledge about being vulnerable to prostate

cancer, and their defeatist attitudes about engaging

in treatment (Robinson et al., 1996; Smith

et al., 1997). Through active listening, social workers

learn that African American men are a diverse

group of people reflecting a variety of responses

to poor health (Berry Winbush, 1996). Thus, individualizing

interventions for these men is an essential

component of practice.

As educators and teachers, social workers must

strive to understand what motivates or does not

motivate African Americans with prostate cancer

to seek information, engage in preventive health

practices, and turn to others for help. African

American men are likely to be more receptive to

prostate cancer screening when they perceive it as

being important, efficacious, and easily integrated

into their daily lives (Myers et al., 1994). Thus, when

giving information, social workers need to ensure

that the explanations for prostate cancer screening

and treatment make sense to African American

men, given their greater susceptibility to the

disease. Social workers should not be surprised or

insulted if men seek help outside the mainstream

service system from family members, friends, and

ministers about what makes sense. Social workers

are cautioned that the informal support received

from others may motivate men to engage in positive

health-related behaviors (Goldberg & Cullen,

1985; Wortman & Dunkel-Schetter, 1979; Myers

et al., 1996) and that it can also be a source of stress

for men (Neighbors, 1997). Social workers should

understand that African American men respond

to illness in various ways. Some may rely on selfhelp

remedies, others on folk medicine, and others

may rely on mainstream services or no treatment

at all (Berry Winbush, 1996). However, an

important point for social workers to remember is

that “treatment action will vary according to class,

region, and degree of assimilation” (Bailey, 1991,

cited in Berry Winbush, p. 12).

Given the importance of religion and the church

to African Americans (Strawbridge et al., 1997),

including men with prostate cancer (Plowden,

1999; Powell, Gelfand, et al., 1995), social workers

may wish to alert African American men about a

pending medical intervention that may conflict

with their religious beliefs or health behaviors. A

man may want the prayerful support of his family

or minister before undergoing the prescribed

medical procedure. Social workers may need to

educate themselves and staff members about how

religion and the church fit into the experience of

African Americans with prostate cancer. Personal

religious beliefs about coping may serve as a barrier

to seeking health care; however, church leaders

may serve as external prompts motivating African

American men seeking health care. Ministers,

for example, play an important role in motivating

African American men to participate in cancer

screening and educat ion programs (Powell,

Gelfand, et al.). Using the church as an informal

309 Prostate Cancer and Psychosocial Concerns in African American Men

help system, social workers may have the potential

of enhancing the overall quality of treatment protocols,

building trust, and promoting participation

of men in preventive health-related behaviors

(Pierce, 1999; Potts, 1996; Powell, Gelfand, et al.).

Finally, social workers may be called on to function

in several roles (for example, educator, enabler,

or broker) simultaneously. If this happens,

they should prioritize their work and focus not only

on the roles that satisfy the medical regimen but

also on the roles that offer the greatest comfort

and well-being to men and their families. Social

workers might also consider that bombarding African

American men with information about prostate

cancer and its treatment may be confusing and

may not be the best way to help them take charge

of their illness. A systems approach, using all facets

of the individual’s context, may be more applicable

to working with African American men because

of the influence of family on a man’s

receptivity to seek prostate cancer screening and

health advice from professionals (Myers et al.,

1996). Family members and ministers, too, are often

allies—motivating men to engage in positive

health-related behaviors, to negotiate medical systems,

and take advantage of health resources.

Research

Drawing on ideas from a national blueprint for

actions to take in prostate cancer research, Eyre

and Feldman (1998) cited several steps to be taken

in basic and behavioral prostate cancer research

that apply to social work research. We adopted

many of their ideas for research recommendations

for social workers. Given conflicting reports about

cancer screening and prevention, research on prostate

cancer should continue to examine the benefits

of screening programs. African American men

contract prostate cancer and die from it at a

younger age than men in the general population

(Parker et al., 1998; Wingo et al., 1998); thus, researchers

should pay careful attention to the lower

survival rate of younger men with prostate cancer.

More descriptive and longitudinal studies of

health-related behaviors and their effect on the degree

of risk for younger men are needed, particularly

when male relatives have been diagnosed with

prostate cancer. Multivariate studies with larger

and more representative samples would increase

understanding about how younger men are at risk

as a result of their family history. Whereas research

shows that African American men report inaccurate

knowledge about prostate cancer even after

they have participated in a knowledge-building

program (Abbot et al., 1998), more imaginative

and rigorous intervention studies that emphasize

cancer prevention and knowledge awareness are

needed. African American men are underrepresented

in prostate cancer clinical trials (Robinson

et al., 1996); thus, researchers should develop partnerships

and collaborate with medical and lay leaders

in African American communities to increase

men’s participation in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Empirical research about family caregiver concerns

for African Americans with prostate cancer

is seriously lacking. More research is needed to

delineate the effect of men’s disability from the

disease on family members’ psychological, social,

and economical well-being (Sharp, 1993).

Because the majority of health research is conducted

and interpreted by members of the dominant

culture, social workers should facilitate greater

involvement of African American researchers, institutions,

and laypeople in prostate cancer research.

Such involvement should include management

and participation in research and advocacy

for research.

Conclusion

Cancer is a frightening experience regardless of who

is diagnosed or when the diagnosis is made. An

individual with a diagnosis of cancer may experience

a number of debilitating psychological and

social conditions, which may challenge the overall

functioning of the person with cancer and his family.

Prostate cancer need not be taken to mean a

man’s death sentence, however. Changing the perceptions

that African American men hold about

cancer can contribute to early cancer detection and

cancer risk-reduction health behavior. Programs

that aim to increase their knowledge and trust about

screening, illness prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation

can facilitate change in misperceptions

about cancer. Greater access to health care for African

American men is warranted because of continuing

economic and noneconomic barriers. Professionals

and community leaders can facilitate a

man’s actions to detect early cancer and lower cancer

risk, and ultimately increase cancer survival, by

offering men educational programs that emphasize

the importance, effectiveness, and ease of engaging

in early detection strategies.

References

Abbott, R. R., Taylor, D. K., & Barber, K. (1998). A

comparison of prostate knowledge in African

310 Health & Social Work / Volume 28, Number 4 / November 2003

American and Caucasian men: Changes from

prescreening baseline to intervention. Cancer

Journal from Scientific American, 4, 175–177.

Abrams, H., Doogan, R., Lampert Hill, H., &

Rosenbaum, C. (1990). The emotional impact of

cancer. In R. Osteen, B. Cady, & P. Rosenthal

(Eds.), Cancer manual (pp. 498–508). Boston:

American Cancer Society.

American Cancer Society. (1998). Facts and figures—

1998. New York: Author.

Berry Winbush, G. (1996). African-American health

care: Beliefs, practices, and service issues. In M.

Julia (Ed.), Multicultural awareness in health care

professionals (pp. 8–22). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Chodak, G. W. (1996). Additional therapy after

prostatectomy: Implications for patient counseling.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88,

139–140.

Christ, G. (1989). Social work in oncology. In J.

Holland & J. Rowland (Eds.), Handbook of

psychooncology: Psychological care of the patient

with cancer (pp. 670–677). New York: Oxford

University Press.

Clayton, A., & Byrd, W. (1993). The African-American

cancer crisis: Part 1. The problem. Journal of

Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 4, 83–101.

Coley, C. M., Barry, M. J., & Mulley, A. G. (1997).

Screening for prostate cancer: Clinical guideline

III. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 480–484.

Damrosch, S. (1991). General strategies for motivating

people to change their behavior. Nursing

Clinics of North America, 26, 833–843.

Demark-Wahnefried, W., Strigo, T., Catoe, K.,

Conaway, M., Brunetti, B., Rimer, B. K., &

Robertson, C. N. (1995). Knowledge, beliefs, and

prior screening behavior among blacks and whites

reporting for prostate cancer screening. Urology,

46, 346–351.

Eyre, H. J., & Feldman, G. E. (1998). Status report on

prostate cancer in African Americans. CA—Cancer

Journal for Clinicians, 48, 315–319.

Franklin, A. J. (1999). Therapeutic support groups for

African American men. In L. Davis (Ed.), Working

with African American males: A guide to practice

(pp. 5–14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Franklin, C. W. (1992). “Hey, Home—Yo, Bro”:

Friendships among black men. In P. M. Nardi

(Ed.), Men’s friendships (pp. 201–214). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Friedman, E. (1994). Money isn’t everything. JAMA,

271, 1535–1538.

Gallup Organization Healthcare Group. (1995,

September). Prostate cancer study. Atlanta:

American Cancer Society.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New

York: Basic Books.

Germino, B. B., Mishel, M. H., Belyea, M., Harris, L.,

Ware, A., & Mohler, J. (1998). Uncertainty in

prostate cancer. Ethnic and family patterns. Cancer

Practice, 6, 107–113.

Goldberg, R. J., & Cullen, L. O. (1985). Factors

important to psychosocial adjustment to cancer: A

review of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine,

20, 803–807.

Julia, M. (1996). Multicultural awareness in health care

professionals. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Landrine, H., & Klonoff, A. (1992). Culture and

health-related schemas: A review and proposal for

interdisciplinary integration. Health Psychology,

11, 267–276.

Lee, C. (1999). Counseling African American men. In

L. Davis (Ed.), Working with African American

males: A guide to practice (pp. 39–53). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lum, D. (2000). Social work practice and people of

color: A process–stage approach. Belmont, CA:

Brooks/Cole.

Mebane, C., Gibbs, T., & Horm, J. (1990). Current

status of prostate cancer in North American black

males. Journal of the National Medical Association,

82, 782–788.

Myers, R. E. (1999). African American men, prostate

cancer early detection examination use, and

informed decision making. Seminars in Oncology,

26, 375–381.

Myers, R. E., Wolf, T. A., Balshem, A. M., Ross, E. A.,

& Chodak, G. W. (1994). Receptivity of African

American men to prostate cancer screening.

Urology, 43, 480–487.

Myers, R. E., Wolf, T. A., McKee, L., McGrory, G.,

Burgh, D. Y., Nelson, G., & Nelson, G. A. (1996).

Factors associated with intention to undergo

annual prostate cancer screening among African

American men in Philadelphia. Cancer, 78, 471–

479.

Ndubuisi, S. C., Kofie, V. Y., Andoh, J. Y., & Schwartz,

E. M. (1995). Black–white differences in the stage

of presentation of prostate cancer in the District

of Columbia. Urology 46, 71–77.

Neighbors, H. W. (1985). Seeking professional help

for personal problems: Black Americans’ use of

health and mental services. Community Mental

Health Journal, 21, 156–166.

Neighbors, H. W. (1997). Husbands, wives, family,

and friends: Sources of stress, sources of support.

In R. J. Taylor, J. S. Jackson, & L. M. Chatters

(Eds.), Family life in black america (pp. 277–292).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Neighbors, H. W., & Taylor, R. J. (1985). The use of

social service agencies by black Americans. Social

Service Review, 59, 258–268.

Optenberg, S. A., Thompson, I., Friedrichs, P., Wojcik,

B., Stein, C. R., & Kramer, B. (1995). Race,

treatment, and long-term survival from prostate

cancer in an equal-access medical care delivery

system. JAMA, 274, 1599–1605.

Parker, S., Johnston Davis, K., Wingo, P., Ries, L., &

Heath, C. (1998). Cancer statistics by race and

ethnicity. CA—Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 48,

31–48.

311 Prostate Cancer and Psychosocial Concerns in African American Men

Pierce, R. (1999). Prostate cancer in African American

men: Thoughts on psychosocial interventions. In

L. Davis (Ed.), Working with African American

males: A guide to practice (pp. 75–90). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Plowden, K. O. (1999). Using the health belief model

in understanding prostate cancer in African

American men. Association of Black Nursing

Faculty, 10, 4–8.

Potts, R. G. (1996). Spirituality and the experience of

cancer in an African-American community:

Implications for psychosocial oncology. Journal of

Psychosocial Oncology, 14, 1–19.

Powell, I. J., Gelfand, D. E., Parzuchowski, J.,

Heilbrun, L., & Franklin, A. (1995). A successful

recruitment process of African American men for

early detection of prostate cancer. Cancer Supplement,

75, 1880–1884.

Powell, I. J., Schwartz, K., & Hussain, M. (1995).

Removal of financial barrier to health care: Does it

impact on prostate cancer at presentation and

survival? A comparative study between black and

white men in a veterans affairs system. Urology, 46,

825–830.

Robbins, A., Whittemore, A. S., & Thom, D. H.

(2000). Differences in socioeconomic status and

survival among white and black men with prostate

cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 151,

409–416.

Robinson, S. B., Ashley, M., & Haynes, M. A. (1996).

Attitudes of African Americans regarding prostate

cancer clinical trials. Journal of Community Health,

21, 77–87.

Rosenstock, I. M. (1960). What research in motivation

suggests for public health. American Journal

of Public Health, 50, 295–301.

Sharp, J. W. (1993). Expanding the definition of

quality of life for prostate cancer. Cancer Supplement,

71, 1078–1082.

Smith, D. S., Bullock, A. D., Catalona, W. J., &

Herschman, J. D. (1996). Racial differences in a

prostate cancer screening study. Journal of Urology,

156, 1366–1369.

Smith, G. E., DeHaven, M. J., Grundig, J. P., & Wilson,

G. R. (1997). African American males and prostate:

Assessing knowledge in the community. Journal of

the National Medical Association, 89, 387–391.

Strawbridge, W. J., Cohen, R. D., Shema, S. J., &

Kaplan, G. A. (1997). Frequent attendance at

religious services and mortality over 28 years.

American Journal of Public Health, 87, 957–961.

Strecher, V. J., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1997). The Health

Belief Model. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K.

Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education:

Theory, research, and practice (pp. 41–60). San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sussman, L. K. (1996). Sociocultural concerns of

diabetes care. In J. D. Haire (Ed.), Management of

diabetes mellitus: Perspectives of care across the life

span (pp. 473–512). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

Targonski, P. V., Guinan, P., & Phillips, C. W. (1991).

Prostate cancer: The stage disadvantage in the

black male. Journal of the National Medical

Association, 83, 1094–1096.

Tingen, M. S., Weinrich, S. P., Heydt, D. D., Boyd, M.

D., & Weinrich, M. C. (1998). Perceived benefits: A

predictor of participation in prostate cancer

screening. Cancer Nursing, 21, 349–357.

Underwood, S. (1991). African American men.

Perceptual determinants of early cancer detection

and cancer risk reduction. Cancer Nursing, 14,

281–288.

Weinrich, M. (1998). Recruitment of African

Americans into prostate cancer screening. Cancer

Practice, 6, 23–29.

Wingo, P. A., Ries, L. A., Rosenberg, H. M., Miller,

D. S., & Edwards, B. K. (1998). Cancer incidence

and mortality, 1973–1995. Cancer, 2, 1197–1209.

Wortman, C. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1979).

Interpersonal relationships and cancer: A theoretical

analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 120–155.

About the Authors

Robert Pierce, PhD, is professor

emeritus, and Letha A. Chadiha, PhD, is

associate professor, University of

Michigan School of Social Work, Ann

Arbor, MI. Amy Vargas, MSW, is an

abdominal transplant social worker, St.

Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

Muriel Mosley, MSW, is assistant chief,

Soldier and Family Support Branch, and

chief, Family Advocacy Training Section,

Academy of Health Sciences, United

States Army, Fort Sam Houston, TX.

 

Home | Up | Support Groups | Prostate Cancer | Gay Prostate Cancer | Testicular Cancer | Enlarged Prostate | Male Breast Cancer | Tests for Men | Prostatitis | Erectile Dysfunction | Peyronie's Disease | Enlarged Breasts | Cells and Cancer | Preventing Cancer | Why Support Groups? | About Malecare | Disclaimer/Privacy | New Dad | More on Cancer | Provenge

General comments or questions about prostate cancer, testicular cancer or any other men's cancer: info@malecare.com
 Comments about this web site: webmaster@malecare.com      
  Website updated on  April 2008
    Copyright © 1998-2008 Malecare, Inc.
a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation in prostate cancer